[Anti-cancer drug was actually a cancer-increasing drug]

After examining a large number of patients who received anti-cancer drug treatment at the American Association for Cancer Research, it was determined that anti-cancer drugs are cancer-increasing drugs that increase cancer many times.
This is now common sense in the pharmaceutical world, but it is not generally known by the poorly known pharmaceutical mafia.
Regarding the treatment of cancer, which is now the number one cause of death in Japan, a large-scale study in the United States found that "the more anti-cancer drug / multi-drug administration groups are, the more" life-threatening side effects "are 7 to 10 times". However, it repopulates in 5 to 8 months. ”“ The multidrug group has a short survival time even if the tumor shrinks. ”“ It is common knowledge that the tumor will live longer without treatment. ” It concludes that "the patient cannot be saved" and "the cancer becomes malignant with administration".

With this result being emphasized by the US Parliamentary Cancer Research Committee OTA, the Cancer Research Committee was formed in 1988 to compare conventional therapy with emergency therapy (almost).
The non-conventional therapy described here is a treatment method based on the idea of ​​increasing the body's resistance through diet, nutrition, immunity, natural diet, and psychotherapy to cure it naturally.
As a result, it was concluded that non-conventional therapy has a higher cure rate without side effects.

The American National Cancer Institute (NCI) has made no significant progress in current treatments in decades.
The government has questioned NCI's research subsidies and is holding NCI's responsibility to the point that it is hard to say that it is treating cancer for the people.
To add to that, the General Accounting Office's 1987 research report even reports that the budget for NCI does not contribute to the survival rate of cancer patients.

After the OTA report, the problem that anti-cancer agents became "cancer-increasing agents" became a big problem at the Japanese Cancer Association meeting in 1988 (1989), and in the same year at the head family NCI, cancer treatment by conventional therapy was a new cancer. The 3000-page report "The etiology of cancer" admits that it produces.
A 1988 NCI report, Causes of Cancer, examined 150,000 patients treated with anti-cancer drugs and determined that anti-cancer drugs are cancer-increasing agents that multiply cancer. ..

According to a 1990 survey by Dr. Eisenberg of Harvard Medical School, the more educated and higher-income people in the United States are, the more they avoid anti-cancer drugs and choose alternative therapies.
According to an estimate of the number of visits to primary care doctors in the United States, the number of visits to general doctors is 388 million times a year, while the number of visits to alternative medicine is 425 million. The number of is increasing.

Out-of-pocket expenses for alternative medicine ($ 1.03 billion) are almost catching up with out-of-pocket expenses for hospitals ($ 1.28 billion), approaching half of out-of-pocket expenses for doctors in the United States ($ 2.35 billion).
By symptomatology, for example, 36% of people with back pain go to alternative medicine.
One-third of Americans provide alternative medicine.
Also, the more educated and the more earned people are, the more they go to alternative medicine.
These data mean that Americans chose alternative medicine.
This Eisenberg report shocked the United States.