"80% of medical treatises related to the new coronavirus are fake"

Articles published after being peer-reviewed by multiple experts (peer-reviewed articles) are said to be superior to previously published articles (pre-print).

However, the situation is different for this new coronavirus fake pandemic.

A meta-analytic paper was reported that the majority of medical papers related to coronavirus disease had some bias in 80% without the original experimental results (COVID-19-related medical research: a meta-research). and critical appraisal. BMC Medical Research Methodology (2021) 21: 1).

By the way, medical treatises with original experimental results accounted for about 9.5% of the total.

In other words, the plethora of medical treatises related to the new coronavirus are just essays that critique the results of other studies.

The content of the essay contains a bias that is in line with the intentions of those in power.

As I mentioned in previous articles, the true evidence is suppressed in various ways.

On the other hand, treatises that follow the narration of those in power are published in so-called first-class medical journals.

Experts and the general public are fooled by the fact that such fake medical treatise pandemics spill over day and night in the media.

I would like to see the end image of the modern system in modern medicine (^ _−) − ☆.