Evolutionary lie

Evolutionary lie

Roughly speaking, there are evolutionary theory and creationism in the theory of origin of human beings, but unless both seem to be wrong, it will not even reach a part of the truth.
Well, it is natural for people who are brainwashed by the religion of science to believe in evolution, and because they do not even know the history of eugenics, they cannot handle it.
The same is true for men who pretend to prioritize logical thinking.
The theory of evolution is famous for the evolution from monkeys to humans, but there are several other theories.

Excerpted from the wiki, evolution is a proposal that organisms have evolved, or various studies and discussions on evolution.
Based on the idea that living things are not immutable but have gradually changed over a long period of time, it is a group of explanations and theories that all the various living things that can be seen today were born in the process.
There are two meanings: a judgment that admits that evolution is occurring, and a theory that explains the mechanism of evolution.
It should be noted that "evolution" in biology purely means "change", not "progress", and is neutral in value judgment. And so on.

I think it is from the perspective of biological adaptation, but various contradictions have been pointed out regarding changes.
As for humans, it's been about 7 million years since they changed from monkeys to humans, but it may be said that this is the theory of evolution, telling a lie that it makes sense even though it doesn't make sense at all.
And creationism appears on the opposite axis of evolution, but there are some contradictions in this creationism as well.
Probably no one can give these answers, but looking at them from both sides will be the basis of the idea.

Let me mention what is generally pointed out as a lie in evolution.
Darwin himself says that it is humans that do not fit the theory of evolution in the first place, and Alfred Russel Wallace, who was collaborating with Darwin, strongly stated that "humans can never be born from monkeys." doing.
The period when the giraffe became long neck began about 25 million years ago, and the "primitive giraffes" 16 million years ago, such as Kansmerix and Samotherium 7 million years ago, of the third tibia It is known that there is a feature that the upper part is long.
Suppose that the lower part of the third tibia begins to grow longer from a member of the modern giraffe (an extinct species) that appeared about 1 million years ago.

It's funny to read a little, but if so, why did it grow so suddenly in the second half, and even if it changed more biologically, it doesn't mean that the giraffe has changed to something other than a giraffe.
Homo sapiens, which appeared 200,000 years ago, and the original human beings have different brain capacities, but it would be impossible to explain this only by changes in eating habits.
It is said that humans and chimpanzees have similar genes, but according to a paper published in the English scientific journal Nature in May 2004 by international research teams in Japan, Germany, and China, the genes for humans and chimpanzees are actually. The result is that it is 83% different.

When the chimpanzee chromosome 22 was deciphered and compared with the corresponding human chromosome, the difference due to base replacement was 1.44%, but there were 68,000 base defects and insertions.
Of the 231 genes that could be compared between the two, only 39 were exactly the same, and 192 genes, which accounted for 83% of the total, had different protein amino acid sequences, and 20% of the 192 genes were Even the structure of the protein has changed.
If the genes differ by 83 percent, the question arises that the evolution of humans mentioned in evolution is fundamentally strange.

After all, evolution is just a conflict between the religion of science and the primitive religion, but at least remember that Darwin mentioned that humans are different.
I do not deny the idea of ​​natural selection itself.
However, the difference between the original and the newcomer is too large to be explained by natural selection.
No evidence of intermediate organisms has been found.
Also, it seems that organisms evolve by mutation, but there is research that they degenerate.
It is generally said that the changes obtained by "mutation" are degenerate changes.
It is proved by research by Dr. Lee Spetner, who taught information theory at Johns Hopkins University.

There are many theories that "intermediate organisms" do not exist.
Trilobites and sponges are said to be so, and there are no existing theories that bridge between invertebrates and the first vertebrate, the fish.
Austin Higgins Clark, a prominent biologist at the Smithsonian Castle, said:
"There is no evidence that humans have evolved in stages from lower forms of life. There is nothing to associate humans with monkeys in any way. Humans suddenly emerged in the same way they are today."
Unlike the delusions of primitive religions, we should think about our origins.