"About the illusion of "super spreader ""

"About the illusion of " super spreader ""

Today, I would like to tell you about the "witch hunting" of "thoroughly finding superspreaders with a Ct value of XX or less, isolating them, and thoroughly inspecting the people around them."

Please be aware that PCR itself is not a valid test for diagnosing virus infection in the first place (for details, see my book, "No Virus Exists," Volume 2).

Let's assume that a virus infection can be diagnosed by PCR.

The PCR test is extremely inaccurate, as the higher the amplification cycle of gene fragments, the more positive it becomes.

For those in power, it is a convenient tool that can change the "number of infected people" by adjusting the amplification cycle (Ct value) of this PCR.

By the way, I have mentioned the number of amplification cycles (Ct value) several times in past articles.

It is said that the lower the number of amplification cycles (Ct value), the higher the viral load (this is also an illusion (^ _−) − ☆).

The higher the viral load, the more infectious it should be, and the more severe and infection-related mortality it should be.

And then, the lower the Ct value, that is, the higher the viral load in modern medicine, the more infectious it is, and it makes sense to make the infected person more severe.

So what is the actual relationship between the number of PCR amplification cycles (Ct value) and the infectivity and severity of the new coronavirus?

It has been reported that the Ct value of PCR cannot measure the infectivity of new coronavirus infections (Ct value is not enough to discriminate patients harbouring infective virus, J Infect. 2021 Mar; 82 (3): e35-e37. ).

Furthermore, it has been reported that there is no correlation between PCR Ct values ​​and severity of disease or mortality in patients with COVID 19 (No correlation between Ct values ​​and severity of disease or mortality in patients with COVID 19). disease, Indian J Med Microbiol. 2021 Jan; 39 (1): 116–117).

And there is no difference in infectiousness, hospitalization rate, and mortality that cause symptoms for others, whether they have a low Ct value and a high Ct value, that is, people with a high viral load or a low viral load in modern medicine. (On the SARS-CoV-2 “Variolation Hypothesis”: No Association Between Viral Load of Index Cases and COVID-19 Severity of Secondary Cases. Front Microbiol. 2021; 12: 646679) (Lowering SARS-CoV- 2 viral load might affect transmission but not disease severity in secondary cases. Lancet Infect Dis. 2021 Apr 14doi: 10.1016 / S1473-3099 (21) 00205-X).

It has been clarified that not only the Ct value of PCR is not related to the severity of the new corona, but also the infectivity (symptomatology), hospitalization rate, mortality rate, etc. that affect others.

In other words, it became clear in real science that the "super spreader" that the media is dripping is not a sweet word like an illusion, but a mass manipulation to instill "fear". There is.

This is the same as the scape gourd (witch hunting) called "Mary of Typhoid Fever" that I mentioned in the first volume of my book "The virus does not exist" (the ritual itself called scape gourd is a pathological ♨️ idea (^ _−) − ☆) ..

This result is natural because the PCR test itself cannot be used to diagnose a virus infection.

Most importantly, even in research papers pointing out these PCR test inconsistencies, it is not the presence or amount of virus (germ theory) that reflects infectivity or severity, but ours. It clearly states that it is a factor of (Béchant's host theory, terrain theory, host permissiveness) (^ _−) − ☆.