"What is the cause of the surge in infant mortality in South Asia? "

According to a report by the United Nations Children's Fund (UNICEF), 220,000 children under the age of 5 have died in South Asian countries such as Afghanistan, Nepal, Bankladesh, India, Pakistan and Sri Lanka. It is said to have reached 8,000 people ("Direct and indirect effects of the COVID-19 pandemic and response in South Asia" UNICEF, March 2021).

This death toll is from the 2020 Global Simultaneous Lockdown Policy, as is Canada's youth mortality.

UNICEF attributed this to health and welfare services, social services such as garbage collection, education and economic shutdowns. The cause is a decrease in the vaccination rate, but ...

In Bangladesh and Nepal, it has become clear that more than 80% of children are being treated for severe malnutrition.

that's right.

Lockdown stopped all activities, including the economy, and killed children in South Asia, who hold most of the world's poor, because they had no food to eat.

Given that the mortality rate associated with coronavirus infection in children under the age of 5 is almost zero, it is no exaggeration to say that the lockdown policy has hit the poor children the most.

In a previous article, I told Sweden that it did not have a strict lockdown policy, and that there are no more excess deaths than in the past.

A recent survey of 87 regions around the world also found that staying at home did not reduce mortality associated with coronavirus infection (Stay-at-home policy is a case). of exception fallacy: an internet-based ecological study. Sci Rep. 2021; 11: 5313.).

Of course, those in power know this, and in addition to genetic vaccines, they are conducting a human experiment called lockdown (suddenly Phase 3) on the world stage to measure its effect (UNICEF data is). , For that).

Let's reconfirm that lockdown is an unethical human experimentation that violates the Nuremberg Code (but is not actually legally binding) (^ _−) − ☆.