Ari Shika's Blog

Posting what I notice day by day. Please visit my "JP Blog" https://ameblo.jp/arishika18/

"What is the content of the mutant infection explosion? "


"What is the content of the mutant infection explosion? "


The Japanese media has also been ordered to disseminate propaganda that the number of infected people is increasing during the Tokyo Olympics.


Will infectious diseases surge in this hot summer?


The new 567 artificial virus, which has a lower infection mortality rate than the influenza virus (the new 567 virus infection is an illusion, and in fact, a collection of various chronic diseases (^ _-)-☆), even in the summer even with influenza virus infection. Will it cause something that doesn't increase?


Here again, let's recall the basics of this media propaganda.


As detailed in my book, the number of infected people = PCR positives increases in proportion to the number of tests.


This is because even a highly accurate test always gives a certain number of false positives (those that are falsely positive due to test inaccuracy).


In particular, you all know that PCR is an inaccurate test with extremely high false positives (positive for Coca-Cola, orange juice and motor oil (^ _−) − ☆).


If the media touts that the number of infected people has skyrocketed, it must be clear how many people have been tested.


Let me give you an example that I gave you.


10 newly infected persons were found on Day 1. 100 new infections were found on Day 2. With this, the current media is making a noise, "10 times more infection explosion!" (To be exact, it is instructed to "incite" using talents and male geisha).


The reality is that on Day 1, we tested a total of 20 people, and on Day 2, we tested a total of 1,000 people. This is the magic of numbers (this real number is an example).


In other words, since the number of infected people can be manipulated by the total number of tests (somewhere the governor of Tokyo heard that "the number of infected people can be increased to"", it was this operation that slipped (^ _-). )-☆.).


Normally, if you do not compare by the ratio (%) of the number of PCR-positive people to the total number of tests, you cannot say "increased number of infected people!" Even if you make a mistake.


Looking at the site that discloses the transition data of the ratio (%) of the number of PCR positives in the world, it can be seen that the current (July 2021) is lower than in January and May of this year. (Https://ourworldindata.org/grapher/positive-rate-daily-smoothed?tab=chart&country=IND~USA~GBR~DEU).


The data on the number of infected people (the number of PCR positive people) is meaningless. The ratio of the number of PCR-positive people (%) is more necessary data.


Another thing to note about PCR is that, as I mentioned in my book, the number of infected people can also be manipulated by manipulating the number of amplification cycles (Ct value).


Reaffirm that you should always check the above statistics and test spoofing when the media touts "Infected people surge!" And the prefectures make urgent declarations. Let's go (^ _−) − ☆.