"The effect of a real gene vaccine is about 1%"

"The effect of a real gene vaccine is about 1%"

In my book, "No Virus Exists," Volume 2 and "The Truth About Vaccines," I told you that the true effect of a vaccine is meaningless unless it is evaluated by "Absolute risk reduction (ARR)." ..

Then, he responded to the doctor who inquired that there was an error in the notation as follows (the errata in the second volume of "The virus does not exist" and the third edition of "The truth of the vaccine" will be revised. ).

(Start posting)
Confirmation of infection after the second inoculation of Pfizer's gene vaccine

・ Placebo 169 / 20,172 = 0.0084 (0.84%)

・ Vaccine 9 / 19,965 = 0.00045 (0.045%)

In Pfizer's Gene Vaccine
Absolute Risk Reduction Rate (ARR) = 0.84-0.0045 = 0.795%

It is an error in the numerical value. Correctly, the effectiveness of the vaccine is 0.8% (absolute reduction rate).

(End of publication)

By the way, this description by my book was finally taken up as a research treatise in the latest paper (Outcome Reporting Bias in COVID-19 mRNA Vaccine Clinical Trials, Medicina (Kaunas). 2021 Mar; 57 (3): 199).

The effects of Pfizer and Modena gene vaccines are touted as 95.1% and 94.1%, respectively.

This is "the magic of numbers" as I mentioned in my book.

Specifically, the value of "Relative risk reduction (RRR)" is used as the effect of the vaccine.

The true effectiveness of the vaccine must be measured by the "absolute risk reduction rate (ARR)", as mentioned above.

In this research paper, when the effects (absolute risk reduction rate) of the gene vaccines of the two companies are recalculated,
・ Pfizer 0.7%
・ Modena 1.1%
It will be.

The effect of the gene vaccine is only about 1% (^ _−) − ☆.

(Of course, this is a calculation of published figures, and I have proved in my book that vaccines cannot actually prevent infectious diseases, especially for modern people with reduced sugar energy metabolism. It is.)

And in the evaluation item (number needed to vaccine (NNV)) of how many people must be sacrificed for vaccine in order to reduce one infected person,

・ Pfizer 142 people
・ Modena 88 people
It will be.

In the case of Pfizer, it is extremely inefficient to prevent one infected person only after vaccination of 142 people.

In the case of general medicines, such medicines such as gambling, which have extremely low effects, are not approved in the first place (^ _−) − ☆.

Furthermore, as mentioned in previous articles, the systemic side effects of the vaccine, such as fever, fatigue, headache, and arthralgia, are the same as the symptoms of the new coronavirus infection.

Therefore, it cannot be ruled out that this clinical trial may simply classify infections occurring in the vaccinated group as side effects of the vaccine.

By doing this, the effectiveness of the vaccine can be expanded.

In addition, as I mentioned in my book, people who actively participate in vaccines tend to be in better health than those who do not (Healthy vaccinee effect), so the results of clinical trials are general. It cannot adapt to the population (including those with chronic illness).

At this point, my claim from the beginning that modern medicine and science imposed by those in power are really just religions and ideas (eugenic ideas). This is becoming more and more real (^ _−) − ☆.