Doctors don't use anti-cancer drugs for themselves

Doctors don't use anti-cancer drugs for themselves

A questionnaire survey of Canadian lung cancer specialists, "What kind of treatment would you like if you were a cancer patient?"
Lung cancer is in stage 3A, but surgery is not impossible.
22% of doctors wanted no treatment.
Only 6% of doctors wish to have surgery.
Even less, 5% of doctors requested anti-cancer drugs.
Others should be inferred.

"Chemotherapy for cancer is powerless. Cancer cells alter the anti-cancer gene (ADG) and quickly become resistant to anti-cancer drug toxicity," said Devita, director of the American National Cancer Institute in 1985. It is carried out.
The issue of anticancer drug resistance of cancer cells was also taken up by the Japanese Cancer Association in 1988.
Even Japanese cancer specialists know about ADG.

Studies in typical university hospitals, for example, have announced a 5-year survival rate of 20% for 716 patients with pancreatic cancer.
Whether you're an amateur or a regular doctor, you'll believe this number, but it's a make-up.
Only five patients actually survived for five years.
In this treatise, the overall denominator is reduced steadily.

Of the 716 patients, the denominator was reduced to 456 on the head of the pancreas, limited to 202 pancreatic duct cancers who were presumed to have successfully resected the cancer, and the denominator was manipulated according to the extent of resection. ..
There is data that many current "anti-cancer drugs work" by doctors cutting the denominator for patients who have not been cured or who are inconvenient.

Papers on anti-cancer drug research are mainly forged.
Forgery here is a level that ordinary people can hardly see.
I will explain it very simply.
For example, let's say you use an anti-cancer drug and your cancer is halved in the test.
The general public will misunderstand that the drug works.
However, the cancer then gains twice as fast growth as before, after which any anticancer drug becomes ineffective.
The result is that people who use anti-cancer drugs die faster than those who do nothing.

Isn't it strange? I think a conscientious ordinary person.
If you die faster with an anti-cancer drug, why is the drug approved?
Why do doctors use the anti-cancer drug?
But asking that question is unaware that he is a duck.
Basically, the government's approval will pass if it is comparatively proved that it has been halved, and it is not known that humans die early or late.
This is the so-called test day trap.

Doctors know this and use it on purpose.
So I don't use it for myself.
There is a famous questionnaire to doctors in the field of cancer treatment, "If you get cancer, do you get anti-cancer drug treatment?", But it is natural that 99% of doctors answered that they do not. is there.
The patient is nothing more than a gold sword for the hospital.